GtPGKogPYT4p61R1biicqBXsUzo" /> Google+ I Smell Sheep: L. Andrew Cooper
Showing posts with label L. Andrew Cooper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label L. Andrew Cooper. Show all posts

Saturday, August 13, 2016

The Ten Cultural Craters Left by Horror Films that Impress Me the Most - L Andrew Cooper

The Ten Cultural Craters Left by Horror Films that Impress Me the Most
L. Andrew Cooper
(with all my biases)



The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919/1920):
The visual design of this movie propped up German Expressionism across the arts and, when major artists fled to America, provided fuel for film noir and other offshoots. It’s not just a great horror film; it’s one of the greatest films of all time. Besides, even people who hate it but know film history would have to admit that few films have been more influential.


The Bride of Frankenstein (1935):
The sequel has more quotable lines, better scenery, additional characters for the canon (the Bride IS Hollywood canon!), and an unforgettable ending. More important, it’s better than the original, and it established the golden franchise that made horror franchises the backbone of the genre until present day.

Eyes without a Face (1960):
Maybe you haven’t seen this French classic, but its director, Georges Franju, was a major voice in French cinema. In the decades that followed, the art world listened. This movie is beautiful, and other films and writings have reflected on its depiction of medical horrors and animal experimentation at length. It’s a cornerstone of modern horror.


Peeping Tom (1960):
So controversial it ended Michael Powell’s career as a mainstream director, this movie is now a classic of British cinema. The main character films women as he kills them—he does it with a spike attached to the camera. We see through the camera, of course: killer-cam. Way ahead of its time in some respects, it’s still old-fashioned in having a sympathetic monster.

Psycho (1960):
Peeping Tom is actually much closer to what we know as slasher movies, but Psycho was and is way more popular around the world. As far as cultural craters go, though, the thing about this movie is the smell. It changed people’s bathing habits. I was about eight years old when I saw it, and even though I knew what was coming, afterward, I was still a little nervous about getting in the shower. I think if you don’t identify with Janet Leigh in that situation, you’re the psycho.


The Exorcist (1973):
An unbelieving single mother and her daughter enlist the help of priests to battle Satan in an exceptionally well-made movie that helped bring America back to the Church. Oh, and the movie was cursed, too, so it displaces Rosemary’s Baby and Poltergeist.


Jaws (1975):
I was born barely after but still count as having had vacations (and tourist dollars) affected by this movie. Movies cause fear of sharks eating tourists… and spawn a school of imitation films. Tourists avoid beaches. Economies tank. Great Whites are over-hunted. The crater deepens.

Friday the 13th (1980):
This movie is hard to explain. Often dismissed as a knock-off of Halloween, a better film, it’s also related to the earlier Italian giallo tradition, especially Mario Bava’s Bay of Blood (1971). Something started around 1960 (see three movies, above), grew up in the 70s, took hold in this movie, and got a hockey mask in part three. Now we’ve got a dozen movies, and Jason rules an era. Strangely, he was barely even in the first film.

The Silence of the Lambs (1991):
The people who let is sweep the Oscars wouldn’t call it a horror movie, and now its super-horrific TV spin-off might or might not get another season and cover the same ground as the movie. Inspired by the same Ed Gein as Psycho and Texas Chain Saw Massacre, the story of Clarice Starling, Buffalo Bill, and Hannibal the Cannibal will live in our livers with fava beans forever.
Ringu (1998): I like the American remake (2002) about as much as I like the original. By then I was pretty desperate for a good horror movie, because Scream’s brief revival of slasher tropes had worn itself out. Behold! International technoparanoia. A distinctly Japanese storyline involving volcanic eruptions and water demons, psychic powers and technology run amok, might have saved American horror.



Snaking through history–from the early-1900s cannibal axe-murderer of “Blood and Feathers,” to the monster hunting on the 1943 Pacific front in “Year of the Wolf,” through the files of J. Edgar Hoover for an “Interview with ‘Oscar,'” and into “The Broom Closet Where Everything Dies” for a finale in the year 2050–Peritoneum winds up your guts to assault your brain. Hallucinatory experiences redefine nightmare in “Patrick’s Luck” and “The Eternal Recurrence of Suburban Abortion.” Strange visions of colors and insects spill through the basements of hospitals and houses, especially the basement that provides the title for “TR4B,” which causes visitors to suffer from “Door Poison.” Settings, characters, and details recur not only in these tales but throughout Peritoneum, connecting all its stories in oblique but organic ways. Freud, borrowing from Virgil, promised to unlock dreams not by bending higher powers but by moving infernal regions. Welcome to a vivisection. Come dream with the insides.


Leaping at Thorns arranges eighteen of L. Andrew Cooper’s experimental short horror stories into a triptych of themes–complicity, entrapment, and conspiracy–elements that run throughout the collection. The stories span from the emotionally-centered to the unthinkably horrific; from psychosexual grossness to absurd violence; from dark extremes to brain-and-tongue twister. These standalone stories add important details to the fictional world and grand scheme of Dr. Allen Fincher, who also lurks in the background of Cooper’s novels Burning the Middle Ground and Descending Lines. 


About the author:
L. Andrew Cooper scribbles horror: novels Burning the Middle Ground and Descending Lines as well as anthologies of experimental shorts Leaping at Thorns (2014 /2016) and Peritoneum (2016). He also co-edited the anthology Imagination Reimagined (2014). His book Dario Argento (2012) examines the maestro’s movies from the 70s to the present. Cooper’s other works on horror include his non-fiction study Gothic Realities (2010), a co-edited textbook, Monsters (2012), and recent essays that discuss 2012’s Cabin in the Woods (2014) and 2010’s A Serbian Film (2015). His B.A. is from Harvard, Ph.D. from Princeton. Louisville locals might recognize him from his year-long stint as WDRB-TV’s “movie guy.”

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

L. Andrew Cooper Guest Post: Do Our Villains need motivation? + giveaway



The Good Dr. Cooper’s Motivation Rant
By: L. Andrew Cooper

Who makes the rules for good fiction writing? Because I have a bone to pick.

One of the golden rules these days is that a character—and in horror, the real issue here is a villain—has to have a motivation. No longer can we hide behind the “motiveless malignity” that Coleridge attributed to Shakespeare’s Iago, one of the best villains ever. No longer can the sociopathic “bad seed,” in itself, compel narrative (unless you build an entire oeuvre around sociopaths, like Bret Easton Ellis has, in which you case you win). If someone does something bad, particularly if that bad thing targets someone else, and especially if it’s weird, then it must have as detailed a mental explanation as possible, like a medical TV show giving you a blow-by-blow of forensic revelation.

Don’t get me wrong. I like me some good explaining. I've had some great arguments about how seriously to take it (briefly mentioned in my book Dario Argento), but I love the psychological explanation at the end of Psycho. The grand design of Se7en is marvelous. In my novel Burning the Middle Ground, antagonist Michael Cox gets as much narrative time spent on him as anyone else, something I did (breaking another big rule about extensiveness of flashbacks) because in his case, an opportunity to observe him and draw conclusions about his motivations is important. But I reveal almost nothing at all about the other antagonist, Jake Warren, who is part of a much larger picture. Of his motivation we get mere hints. I think that works to give him a very different kind of creepy vibe. And if this book leads to the trilogy I've planned, could a character show up who seems to have no discernible motivation at all? Absolutely. I’ll admit to having one in mind. I find him kind of terrifying.

Why? Because we shouldn't understand evil too easily, if at all. I enjoy a lot of “empathy with the killer” fiction, but luckily I think it’s pretty fake. I don’t understand why someone would beat a child or even kick a dog. I can supply words that other people would recognize as an explanation for such a behavior, but my ability to supply those words does not mean I understand the violence. That anything approaching the nasty stuff I write about could ever actually happen is so horrifying it defies comprehension, so why should I pretend that it has a neat motivation that we can all tidily understand? Violence against others is always irrational: even when its outcome is justified or necessary, as it sometimes is, that moment of violence is a moment outside reason. So why should we be forced to say that violence is ever entirely within reason’s grasp, within reach of a concept as comforting as motivation? Horror is a condition. Those of us who take up writing it must present the condition in such a way as to give readers insights and thrills. We can do our jobs with or without motivations.



Burning the Middle Ground is a dark fantasy about small-town America that transforms readers’ fears about the country’s direction into a haunting tale of religious conspiracy and supernatural mind control. A character-driven sensibility like Stephen King’s and a flair for the bizarre like Bentley Little’s delivers as much appeal for dedicated fans of fantasy and horror as for mainstream readers looking for an exciting ride. Brian McCullough comes home from school and discovers that his ten-year-old sister Fran has murdered their parents. Five years later, a journalist, Ronald Glassner, finds Brian living at the same house in the small town of Kenning, Georgia. Planning a book on the McCullough Tragedy, Ronald stumbles into a struggle between Kenning’s First Church, run by the mysterious Reverend Michael Cox, and the New Church, run by the rebellious Jeanne Harper. At the same time, Kenning’s pets go berserk, and dead bodies, with the eyes and tongues removed from their heads, begin to appear. 


About the Author:
website-FB-twitter-goodreads
L. Andrew Cooper thinks the smartest people like horror, fantasy, and sci-fi. Early in life, he couldn't handle the scary stuff –he’d sneak and watch horror films and then keep his parents up all night with his nightmares. In the third grade, he finally convinced his parents to let him read grownup horror novels: he started with Stephen King’s Firestarter, and by grade five, he was 
doing book reports on The Stand. 

When his parents weren't being kept up late by his nightmares, they worried that his fascination with 
horror fiction would keep him from experiencing more respectable culture. That all changed when he transitioned from his public high school in the suburbs of Atlanta, Georgia to uber-respectable Harvard University, where he studied English Literature. From there, he went on to get a Ph.D. in English from Princeton, turning his longstanding engagement with horror into a dissertation. The dissertation. on became the basis for his first book, Gothic Realities (2010). More recently, his obsession with horror movies turned into a book about one of his favorite directors, Dario Argento (2012). He also co-edited the textbook Monsters (2012), an attempt to infect others with the idea that scary things are worth people’s serious atention. 

After living in Florida, South Carolina, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and California, Andrew now lives in Louisville, Kentucky, where he teaches at the University of Louisville and chairs the board of the Louisville Film Society, the city’s premiere movie-buff
institution. Burning the Middle Ground is his debut
novel. 




Tour Schedule and Activities 
May 8 Read 2 Review Character Post 
May 9 readings Sunshine Review
May 10 Spellbindings Guest Post
May 11 Beagle Book Space Promo/Spotlight
May 12 SpecMusicMuse Review
May 14 Workaday Reads Guest Post
May 15 The FlipSide of Julianne Interview
May 16 Once Upon a Time Guest Post
May 17 Sheila Deeth Character Post
May 18 Azure Dwarf Review
May 19 MikesFilmTalk Review
May 20 Laurie’s Thoughts and Reviews Interview
May 21 Beauty in Ruins Review
May 24 Book Den Guest Post
May 25 Come Selahway With Me Excerpt
May 28 The Dan O’Brien Project Promo/Excerpt
May 31 Armand Rosamilla, Horror Author Guest Post
June 1 Bee’s Knees Reviews Review
June 3 Rachel Tsoumbako Review
June 4 Fictional Candy Excerpt
June 5 I Smell Sheep Guest Post
June 7 Darlene’s Book Nook Guest Post

To enter BlackWyrm-Publishing tour wide giveaway click on the link